There is also the matter of Chazal's classification of what is a "fish." Chazal don't use biological scientific classifications when they say these things. The vast majority of fish that have scales have fins. It doesn't mean there are absolutely no exceptions. It is not permitted to advertise sites that spew Apikorsus.Ībout the fish scales, Rav Yonason Eyebuschitz (Kreisi Upleisi 40) writes that Chazal say these things as general rules. I took the liberty of lightly editing your post. While I know that they are wrong, I would like to know more about why.įurthermore, are there some seforim (in English even better) that deal with specific issues that the apikorsim have raised in the past? Like a da ma shetoshiv for things which look like "bad science" on the part of chazal Pesachim 94b: “The wise men of Israel say that during the day the sun goes below the firmament and at night above the firmament, and the wise men of the Gentiles say that during the day the sun goes below the firmament and at night below the ground.” There are many examples far better than this. ![]() He has many articles of a similar nature. I was hoping you could elaborate on his claims. ![]() This gentleman's website, although certainly coming from a bad standpoint, brings sources that these may not be so full-proof.citing fish that have scales and no fins. One of my favorite (and many people's) proofs of the Torah's divine origin is the simanim on the kosher animals except for the 4 animals mentioned in Vayikra and also that famous Gemaras about all fish with scales also have fins.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |